From Religion to Spirtuality…..the road less travelled.

 “The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.”(Albert Einstein)

I recently came across this quote from Albert Einstein. I thought it was interesting as my Husband and I have often had this discussion.

I don’t think organized religions; be it Islam, Christianity, Judaism,  have a role left to play in our lives today. They seem inept at addressing social and personal issues arising from a modern way of life. The focus of organized religions was around organizing society and bringing a civil order.

Now as societies have become civilized, individuals are no longer looking towards religion to answer questions pertaining to moral conduct, inheritance, nutrition, Science, etc. They need religion for personal growth, for spiritual development and organized religions seem to be lagging in the realm of individual spiritual growth. They have nothing more to offer other than religious theology and dogma.

Religion seemed to have outlived its original purpose. It is now struggling to  find a role for itself  in modern life: through fear, through terror, through religious clergy, through traditions, but is still unable to find  a well defined purpose for its existence. Extremism and fundamentalism are its last attempt to survive, to slow down the natural evolution and progression of civilization.

As the world and our lives become more global,  our problems just like our needs are no longer limited to geography, race or culture. We need an ideology that brings  people, cultures, races and humanity together.  Ideologies that build on commonalities rather than differences. How can ideologies that are too small to even share ‘their’ God, hold within them big solutions.

Religion was the product of a need: a need of a time, a need of a people and a need of a civilization. In the same way its demise is also the need of the people, a need of modern civilization and a need of humanity.

God and spirituality will continue to exist even without religion.

Liberal or Conservative?

liberaladj

tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition. Favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.

Conservativeadj

favoring the preservation of established customs, values, etc, and opposing  innovation or change. A person who is reluctant to change or consider new ideas

When I read the definition of these two words I wonder “who am I, a liberal or a conservative?”  I strongly believe in and value customs and traditions. I am religious, I dress conservatively- what does that make me?

These are my personal beliefs and choices, and I believe that each person has the right to their personal beliefs, whether those beliefs or choices are liberal or conservative.  It seems that in order to ensure that I can keep my individual, conservative choices, I HAVE TO BE LIBERAL.

Being liberal or conservative is not about YOU. It should have very little to do with  your views on gay marriage,  or abortion, or whether you go to church or not, or how you dress. Being a Liberal or Conservative is about how you view others choices.

If you believe your opinion, whether liberal or conservative, has the right to exist, then how can one be a conservative. If you are a conservative then you have given someone, somewhere in the world,  the right to extinguish your opinion and bulldoze their own: that someone can be a priest, a Taliban, a preacher, a follower, a fascist, a racist or a terrorist.